Gobierno de la ciudad de Buenos Aires

Hospital Neuropsiquiátrico "Dr. José Tiburcio Borda"

Laboratorio de Investigaciones Electroneurobiológicas

y Revista

Electroneurobiología
ISSN: 0328-0446

 

The Nervous Principle:

Active versus Passive Electric Processes In Neurons

   

by

 

Danko Dimchev Georgiev, M.D.

Division of Electron Microscopy, Medical University of Varna, Varna 9000, BULGARIA

Correspondencia / Contact: dankomed@SoftHome.net 

   

Electroneurobiología 2004; 12 (2), pp. 169-230; URL: http://electroneubio.secyt.gov.ar/index2.htm 

Copyright © 2004 del autor / by the author. Esta es una investigación de acceso público; su copia exacta y redistribución por cualquier medio están permitidas bajo la condición de conservar esta noticia y la referencia completa a su publicación incluyendo la URL original (ver arriba). / This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's full citation and original URL (above).

Acceso de red permanente: puede obtener un archivo .PDF (2 Mb: recomendado) o .DOC (1,5 Mb) para imprimir esta investigación, de / You can download a .PDF (2 Mb, recommended) or a .DOC file (1.5 Mb) for printing, from http://electroneubio.secyt.gov.ar/index2.htm También como archivo .htm comprimido / Also as a compressed-htm .ZIP file  


Abstract

    This essay presents in the first section a comprehensive introduction to classical electrodynamics. The reader is acquainted with some basic concepts like right-handed coordinate system, vector calculus, particle and field fluxes, and learns how to calculate electric and magnetic field strengths in different neuronal compartments.

    Then the exposition comes to explain the basic difference between a passive and an active neural electric process; a brief historical perspective on the nervous principle is also provided. A thorough description is supplied of the nonlinear mechanism generating action potentials in different compartments, with focus on dendritic electroneurobiology. Concurrently, the electric field intensity and magnetic flux density are estimated for each neuronal compartment.

    Observations are then discussed, succinctly as the calculated results and experimental data square. Local neuronal magnetic flux density is less than 1/300 of the Earth’s magnetic field, explaining why any neuronal magnetic signal would be suffocated by the surrounding noise. In contrast the electric field carries biologically important information and thus, as it is well known, acts upon voltage-gated transmembrane ion channels that generate neuronal action potentials. Though the transmembrane difference in electric field intensity climbs to ten million volts per meter, the intensity of the electric field is estimated to be only ten volts per meter inside the neuronal cytoplasm.

 

Principio del funcionamiento nervioso: oposición de procesos eléctricos activos y pasivos en las neuronas

Sumario

    Este trabajo presenta en su primera sección una introducción general a la electrodinámica clásica. Cubre los temas electroneurobiológicos introductorios de la mayoría de los cursos de neurociencias, asegurando ante todo la familiaridad del estudiante con los sistemas de coordenadas a mano derecha, así como con el cálculo de vectores y con los flujos de partículas y de campo. En esta sección el lector aprende a calcular las intensidades de campo eléctricas y magnéticas dentro de los diferentes compartimientos neuronales.

    Luego la exposición se aboca a explicar la esencial diferencia entre procesos neuroeléctricos pasivos y activos; se provee también una breve perspectiva histórica sobre el principio o fundamento de la función neural. Proporciónase una descripción detallada de los mecanismos no lineares que generan potenciales de acción en los diferentes compartimientos, con énfasis en la electroneurobiología dendrítica. Concurrentemente se estiman la intensidad de campo eléctrico y la densidad de flujo magnético para cada compartimiento neuronal.

    Las observaciones son entonces analizadas, sucintamente por cuanto los resultados calculados cuadran bien con los datos experimentales. La densidad local del flujo magnético es menos que 1/300  de la del campo magnético terrestre, lo que explica por qué cualquier señal magnética útil es sofocada por el ruido ambiental. En contraste, el campo eléctrico porta información biológicamente relevante y, como es muy bien sabido, actúa sobre canales iónicos transmembranales abiertos y cerrados por voltaje, que controlan el potencial de acción de la célula. Aunque la diferencia en la intensidad del campo eléctrico a través de la membrana asciende a diez millones de voltios por metro y aun más, la intensidad del campo eléctrico se estima en sólo diez voltios por metro dentro del citoplasma neuronal.

 

Нейронный принцип: сравнительное описание активных и пассивных электрическиx процесcов

Резюме

    Первая часть представляет собой краткое введение в класическую электродинамику. Здесь приведены общие положения, излагаемые во многих учебниках физики: правоориентированная координатная система, векторноe исчисление, поток из частиц и полевый поток. В этой части читатель знакомится со способами вычисления интенсивности электрического и магнитного поля в различных структурах нервной клетки.

    Во второй части объясняется различие между активными и пассивными электрическими процессами в нейронах. Эта проблема рассматривается также в историческом аспекте. Представлено подробное описание нелинейных механизмов генерации действующих потенциалов в отдельных структура нервной клетки, и особенно электронейробиологии дендритов. Для каждого органа клетки (дендриты, сома, аксон) вычислены интенсивности электрического и магнитного поля.

    Полученные результаты соответствуют экспериментальным данным. Плотность локального магнитого потока нейронов составляет менее 1/300 плотности магнитного потока Земли. Поэтому шум среды подавляет магнитный сигнал нейрона. Напротив, электрическое поле несет биологически значимую информацию и оказывает влияние на зависящие от разности потенциалов ионные каналы которые генерируют действующие потенциалы нейронов. Несмотря на то, что трансмембранное электрическое поле достигает 10 миллионов В/м, в нейронной протоплазме интенсивность электрического поля составляет лишь 10 В/м.

 

Table of Contents

1 Classical electrodynamics

    1.1 Right-handed coordinate systems 

    1.2    Vectors

    1.3 Gradient

    1.4 Particle and field fluxes

    1.5 Electric field

    1.6 Electric currents

    1.7 Magnetic field

    1.8 Electromagnetic induction

    1.9 Maxwell’s equations

2 Electric and magnetic fields in neurons

    2.1 Passive electric properties – cable equation

        2.1.1 Spread of voltage in space and time

        2.1.2 Assessment of the electric field intensity

        2.1.3 Propagation of local electric currents

    2.2 Active electric properties – the action potential

        2.2.1 Nernst equation and diffusion potentials

        2.2.2 Resting membrane potential

        2.2.3 Generation of the action potential

    2.3 Dendrites

        2.3.1 Electric intensity in dendritic cytoplasm

        2.3.2 Electric currents in dendrites

        2.3.3 Magnetic flux density in dendritic cytoplasm

        2.3.4 Active dendritic properties

    2.4 Neuronal somata

    2.5 Axons

        2.5.1 The Hodgkin-Huxley model of axonal firing

        2.5.2 Passive axonal properties

        2.5.3 Electric intensity in the axonal cytoplasm

        2.5.4 Magnetic flux density in axonal cytoplasm

    2.6 Electric fields in membranes 

References

 

 

1    Classical electrodynamics

 

In order to investigate the electromagnetic field structure in neurons it behooves to be acquainted with the basic mathematical definitions and physical postulates in classical electrodynamics. Before anything else, it is worth pointing out that a quantity is either a vector or a scalar. Scalars are quantities fully described by a magnitude alone. Vectors are quantities fully described by both a magnitude and a direction. Because we will work mostly with vectors we have to define what is positive normal to a given surface s, what is the positive direction of a given contour Γ and what is a right-handed coordinate system.

 

1.1    Right-handed coordinate systems

 

Right-handed coordinate system Oxyz is such a system in which if the z-axis points toward your face the counterclockwise rotation of the Ox axis to the Oy axis has the shortest possible path. The positive normal +n of given surface s closed by contour Γ is collinear with the Oz axis of right-handed coordinate system Oxyz whose x- and y-axis lie in the plane of the surface. The positive direction of the contour Γ is the direction in which the rotation of x-axis to the y-axis has the shortest possible path (Zlatev, 1972).

 

 

FIG 1 Left: Direction of the positive normal +n and the positive direction of the contour Γ. Right: Right handed coordinate system Oxyz.

 

1.2    Vectors

 

After that, for working with vectors it should be noted that there are two types of multiplication of vectors - the dot product and the cross product. Geometrically, the dot product of two vectors is the magnitude of one times the projection of the other along the first. The symbol used to represent this operation is a small dot at middle height (·), which is where the name dot product comes from. Since this product has magnitude only, it is also known as the scalar product:

 

 

where b is the angle between the two vectors.

 

Geometrically, the cross product of two vectors is the area of the parallelogram between them. The symbol used to represent this operation is a large diagonal cross (×), which is where the name cross product comes from. Since this product has magnitude and direction, it is also known as the vector product:

 

 

where the vector is a unit vector perpendicular to the plane formed by the two vectors. The direction of is determined by the right hand rule.

 

The right hand rule says that if you hold your right hand out flat with your fingers pointing in the direction of the first vector and orient your palm so that you can fold your fingers in the direction of the second vector, then your thumb will point in the direction of the cross product.

 

1.3    Gradient

 

The gradient is a vector operator called Del or Nabla (Morse & Feshbach, 1953; Arfken, 1985; Kaplan, 1991; Schey, 1997). It is denoted as:

f = grad(f)

 

The gradient vector is pointing toward the higher values of f, with magnitude equal to the rate of change of values. The direction of f is the orientation in which the directional derivative has the largest value and |f| is the value of that directional derivative. The directional derivative uf(x0,y0,z0) is the rate at which the function f(x,y,z) changes at a point (x0,y0,z0) in the direction u.

 

and  is the unit vector (Weisstein, 2003).

1.4    Particle and field fluxes

 

The particle flux is a scalar physical quantity defined by the expression:

 

,

 

where

 

 

dV denotes a volume segment with length dl that is filled with fluid that for time dt passes with velocity v trough any cross section s of dV; β is the is the angle between the vectors  and . It is worth to remind that  has the direction of the positive normal +n, and its magnitude is proportional to the surface area s. Simple substitution of the expression for dV  into the expression for gives us

 

 

Thus we have obtained that the particle flux is a scalar product of two vectors - the particle velocity vector  and the surface vector . In electrodynamics, ion currents in electrolytes and the currents composed of electrons are the particle fluxes of top neurobiological interest, but quasiparticles such as solitons and phonons are also modeled.

 

We could define an analogous scalar quantity when we investigate physical fields, e.g. the field of electromagnetic force or electromagnetic field. There we can define the field flux as a scalar product of the field intensity  through surface .

 

1.5    Electric field

 

The electromagnetic force field is composed from the forces of electric and magnetic fields, whose different causal actions can be nonetheless described as mediated by a single sort of microphysical change-causing energy packets, called photons. Taking the photons’ action collectively – like as floods can be described by neglecting the swervings of individual water molecules – the electric field could be described via the vector field of electric intensity . Electric intensity is defined as the ratio of the electric force acting upon a charged body and the charge q of the body:

 

 

It should be noted that the electric field is a potential field – that is, the work WΓ along closed contour Γ with any length l is zero:

 

 

Every point in the electric field has an electric potential V defined with the specific (for unit charge) work needed to carry a charge from this point to infinity. The electric potential of point c of a given electric field has potential V defined by:

 

 

where V= K = 0. The electric potential difference between two points 1 and 2 defines voltage V, whose synonyms are electric potential, electromotive force, potential, potential difference, and potential drop:

 

 

The link between the electric intensity  and the gradient of the voltage V is:

 

 

Another vector, not directly measurable, that describes the electric field is the vector of electric induction . For isotropic dielectrics electric induction is defined as:

 

 

where ε is the electric permittivity of the dielectric. The electric permittivity of the vacuum is denoted as ε0 = 8.84×10-12 F/m.

 

The Maxwell’s law for the electric flux ФD of the vector of electric induction  says that ФD through any closed surface s is equal to the located in the space region s charge q that excites the electric field. This could be expressed mathematically:

 

 

If the normal +n of the surface s and the vector  form angle b, then the flux ФD could be defined as:

 

 

 

FIG 2 The flux ФD of the vector of the electric induction  through surface s.

 

From the Maxwell’s law we could easily derive the Gauss’ theorem:

 

 

where ФE is the flux of the vector of the electric intensity  through the closed surface s.

 

It is important to note that the full electric flux ФD could be concentrated only in a small region Δs of the closed surface s, so in such cases we could approximate:

 

In other cases, when the electric field is not concentrated in such a small region but we are interested in knowing the partial electric flux ΔФD through partial surface Δs for which is responsible electric charge Δq, it is appropriate to use the formula:

 

 

1.6    Electric currents

 

The electric current i , that is the flux of physical charges, could be defined by using both scalar and vector quantities (Zlatev, 1972):

 

 

where  is the density of the electric current. As a scalar quantity the current density J is defined by the following formula:

 

 

where sn is the cross section of the current flux ФJ. It is useful to note that usually by means of i it is denoted the flow of positive charges. In the description, the flow of negative charges could be easily replaced by a positive current with equal magnitude but opposite direction. Sometimes, however, we would like to underline the nature of the charges in the current. To this purpose we will use vectors with indices, e.g.  or , where the direction of the vectors coincides with the direction of motion of the negative or positive charges.

 

If we have a cable and a current flowing through it, according to Ohm's law the current i is proportional to the voltage V and conductance G and inversely proportional to the resistance R:

 

 

where ρ is the specific resistance for the media, γ is the specific conductance, l is the length of the cable and s is its cross section.

 

1.7    Magnetic field

 

The magnetic field is the second component of the electromagnetic field and is described by the vector of magnetic induction  (also known as: magnetic field strength or magnetic flux density) that is perpendicular to the vector of the electric intensity . The magnetic field does only act on moving charges. It manifests itself via the magnetic force  acting upon flowing currents inside the region where the magnetic field is distributed. From Laplace’s law it is known that the magnetic force , which acts upon an electric current-conveying cable immersed in a magnetic field with magnetic induction , is equal to the vector product:

 

 

If we have a magnetic dipole, the direction of the vector of magnetic induction is from the south pole (S) to the north pole (N) inside the dipole – and from N to S outside it.

 

The magnetic field could be excited either via changes in an existing electric field  or by a flowing electric current i. In the first case the magnetic induction is defined by the Ampere’s law (in case J = 0):

 

 

In the second case, if we have a cable with current i, it will generate a magnetic field with magnetic induction  whose lines of force have the direction of rotation of a right-handed screw piercing in the direction of the current i.

 

FIG 3 Direction of the lines of magnetic induction around the path axis with current (a) and along the axis of contour with current (b). The current i by convention denotes the flux of positive charges.

 

The total electromagnetic field manifests itself with a resultant electromagnetic force  defined by the Coulomb-Lorentz formula:

 

 

where  is the velocity of the charge q.

 

If we have magnetically isotropic media, then we could define another vector describing the magnetic field. It is called magnetic intensity , tantamount to

 

 

where μ is the magnetic permeability of the media. The magnetic permeability of the vacuum is denoted with μ0 = 4π×10-7 H/m.

 

The circulation of the vector of magnetic intensity along the closed contour Γ1 with length l, which interweaves in its core the contour Γ2 with current i flowing through Γ2, is defined by the formula:

 

 

It can be seen that the magnetic field is a non-potential field, since the lines of field intensity  are closed and do always interweave the contour with the excitatory current i. The circulation of the vector  will be zero only along the closed contours which do not interweave in their cores any current i (Zlatev, 1972).

 

 

FIG 4 The circulation of the vector of magnetic intensity  along the closed contour Γ1 equals the current i flowing through the interweaved contour Γ2.

 

1.8    Electromagnetic induction

 

Analogously to defining the flux ФD of the vector of the electric induction  we can define the flux ФB of the vector of the magnetic induction :

 

 

It is useful to know that the change in magnetic flux generates induced voltage V according to the Lenz’s law:

 

Thus the Lenz’s law shows that there will be induced voltage (and therefore electric current) if there is a static cable inside changing magnetic field:

 

 

or if the cable is moving inside a static magnetic field:

 

 

The full magnetic flux ФL of the magnetic field self-induced by a contour with current i is called self-induced flux. The self-induced flux is a linear function of the current:

 

 

where L is scalar known as self-inductance and depends only on the magnetic permittivity μ of the media and the geometric parameters ΠL that determine the size and the shape of the contour:

 

L = f (m , PL)

 

Self-induced voltage appears on electric wires every time that there is a change of the current i – and this self-induced voltage opposes to the change of the current:

 

 

1.9    Maxwell’s equations

 

We have up till now presented the basic principles of electromagnetism. In order to summarize them it is useful to write down the Maxwell’s equations. Although these equations have been worked out more than a century ago they present in concise form the whole electrodynamics. We will consider two cases: (i) in the absence of magnetic or polarizable media and (ii) with magnetic and/or polarizable media.

 

In absence of magnetic or polarizable media the equations can be written in both forms, i.e. in integral or differential form. They will be listed on the following table.

Table 1 Maxwell’s equations in the absence of magnetic or polarizable media.

 

Laws

Integral form

Differential form

Gauss’ law for electricity